Clinical Skin Disorder Multi-Class Classification
Automated differential diagnosis of 6 erythemato-squamous dermatology diseases with 98.65% multi-class accuracy

Bagging Classifier (200 Estimators)
Multi-Class Test Accuracy: 98.65%
Macro F1-Score: 98.67% | 5-Fold CV: 97.60%
366 patient cases
34 clinical & histopathological markers
Target: 6 distinct skin diseases
98.65% Multi-Class Accuracy & 98.67% F1-Score across all 6 dermatological classes
Verified Notebook Results
Technologies & Machine Learning Frameworks
01Business & Clinical Problem Context
02Data Pipeline & Model Engineering
03Algorithm Evaluation & Empirical Benchmarks
| Algorithm / Model | Train Score | Test Accuracy / Score | 5-Fold CV | F1-Score / Metric | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bagging Classifier (Tuned) | 99.32% | 98.65% | 97.60% | 98.67% | best |
| Random Forest (2000 Trees) | 100.0% | 97.30% | 98.63% | 97.35% | contender |
| Logistic Regression (Liblinear) | 99.32% | 97.30% | 98.64% | 97.35% | contender |
| K-Nearest Neighbors (Manhattan) | 100.0% | 97.30% | 97.95% | 97.35% | contender |
| Decision Tree (Entropy) | 96.58% | 97.30% | 95.55% | 97.31% | baseline |
| Support Vector Machine (RBF) | 100.0% | 95.95% | 98.63% | 96.04% | baseline |
Multi-class classification across 6 overlapping conditions typically suffers from high inter-class boundary confusion. Here, the Bagging Classifier achieved 98.65% Test Set Accuracy and 98.67% F1-Score, tightly tracking its 99.32% training accuracy (only 0.67% variance gap). Random Forest and Logistic Regression also proved exceptionally strong with 97.30% test accuracy, proving solid mathematical separability.
04Quantifiable Business & Operational Impact
05Challenges Encountered & Engineering Solutions
06Key Data & Diagnostic Insights
Interested in deploying ML solutions like this?
Whether you are hiring for an ML/AI role or need high-performance predictive pipelines built for your business, let's connect and discuss your requirements.